Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Natalija Senic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Wilda Hennemann vs N. Senic

Caijsa Wilda Hennemann

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

664

C. Rank

411

283

Best Rank

341

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Natalija Senic

SRB

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

664

C. Rank

411

283

Best Rank

341

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Senic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2 and Natalija Senic winning 0. The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Natalija Senic was at the W35 Kursumlijska Banja, 06-06-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hennemann	1
Senic	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) W35 Kursumlijska Banja(06-06-24)

Stats

Caijsa Wilda Hennemann

Natalija Senic

C. W. Hennemann vs N. Senic H2H Profile

C. W. Hennemann	Stats	N. Senic
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
64.36% (195-108)	Career Total W/L	72.13% (176-68)
1	Clay	0
9	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	100.00% (1-0)

C. W. Hennemann vs N. Senic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 35.20% of points on their second serve, while Natalija Senic has won 34.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caijsa Wilda Hennemann, in recent form, has won 54.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natalija Senic has won 49.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.94% and 31.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natalija Senic has saved 36.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 81.25% of matches played (W/L 26/6), with Natalija Senic winning 71.93% (W/L 41/16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 154/82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/17). Natalija Senic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 171/63), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.00% of matches (W/L 19/6), where as Natalija Senic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 18/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 1 times and Natalija Senic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2 and Natalija Senic winning 0.
The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Natalija Senic was at the W35 Kursumlijska Banja, 06-06-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.66 while Natalija Senic has played against players with an average rank of 403.07.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natalija Senic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has converted 45.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natalija Senic has converted 39.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Natalija Senic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. W. Hennemann vs N. Senic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. W. Hennemann	Stats	N. Senic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
2	Aces (Total)	1
0	Total Double Faults	1
1:30:0	Average Match Time	1:30:0
76% (45/59)	1st Serve %	61% (30/49)
69% (31/45)	1st Serve Win %	47% (14/30)
50% (7/14)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (9/19)
50% (5/10)	Break Pts Won %	22% (2/9)
53% (26/49)	Return Points Win %	36% (21/59)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. W. Hennemann Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W35 Santa Margherita di Pula - 29-09-2025
R1 Nellie Taraba WallbergN. Taraba	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
W35 Santa Margherita di Pula - 22-09-2025
SF Sara CakarevicS. Cakarevic	L	3-6 7-6(6) 6-3	Stats
QF Noemi BasilettiN. Basiletti	W	6-2 7-5	Stats
R2 Gaia MaduzziG. Maduzzi	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Yasmine KabbajY. Kabbaj	W	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Senic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W50 Pazardzhik - 22-09-2025
Q3 Katerina TsygourovaK. Tsygourova	L	6-0 2-0 ret.	Stats
Q1 Maria DimitrovaM. Dimitrova	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
W75 Kursumlijska Banja - 15-09-2025
R2 Ranah Akua StoiberR. Akua	L	6-4 5-7 6-2	Stats
R1 Weronika FalkowskaW. Falkowska	W	7-6(2) 3-6 6-3	Stats
W15 Kursumlijska Banja - 08-09-2025
F Giulia Safina PopaG. Safina	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

C. W. Hennemann vs N. Senic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. W. Hennemann	Stats	N. Senic
64.36% (195/108)	YTD Win/Loss	72.13% (176/68)
61.19% (421/267)	Sets Win/Loss	70.48% (370/155)
54.92% (3385/2779)	Games Win/Loss	60.54% (2700/1760)
63.64% (14/8)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
65.25% (154/82)	Clay Win/Loss	73.08% (171/63)
60.00% (27/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.56% (5/4)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.12
241	Aces Total	251
0.16	Double Faults Per Game	0.19
496	Total Double Faults	406
1:34:3	Average Match Time	1:23:14
496.86	Average Opponent Rank	428.85
67% (11837/17694)	1st Serve %	60% (7270/12107)
57% (6747/11837)	1st Serve Win %	62% (4517/7270)
47% (2747/5875)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (2376/4837)
51% (1244/2417)	Break Points Won % (Total)	56% (1028/1836)
50% (8472/17094)	Return Points Win %	52% (6417/12295)
60.00% (9/6)	Cups W/L	100.00% (1/0)
56.69% (89/68)	Challenger W/L	60.00% (36/24)
74.05% (97/34)	Futures W/L	75.96% (139/44)
64% (192/300)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	73% (174/239)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
57% (25/44)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (20/34)
60% (50/83)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (21/40)
88% (194/171)	1st Set Won, Won Match	94% (176/165)
12% (194/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	6% (176/11)
22% (109/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (68/11)